Imagery Info Deal Between Google and Nasa

admin    Google     between, deal, Google, Imagery, info, Nasa

Google Inc. and NASA Ames Research Center said that they have finalized an agreement to deliver more of the space agency’s imagery and information through the Internet’s leading search engine.

The collaboration marks another step in a partnership announced 15 months ago when Google unveiled plans to build a 1 million-square-foot campus at the NASA center, located a few miles south of the company’s Mountain View headquarters.

Under the arrangement, Ames will feed Google with its weather forecasting information, three-dimensional maps of the moon and Mars, and real-time tracking of the International Space Station and space shuttle flights so the pictures and data are available to anyone with an Internet connection.

Google already draws upon some of NASA’s imagery to provide Web surfers with interactive tours of Mars as part of a 9-month-old service.

This agreement between NASA and Google will soon allow every American to experience a virtual flight over the surface of the moon or through the canyons of Mars, NASA Administrator Michael Griffin said in a statement.

Ames and Google also have vowed to work together to solve complex computing problems, including large-scale data management.

“Partnering with NASA made perfect sense for Google, as it has a wealth of technical expertise and data that will be of great use to Google as we look to tackle many computing issues on behalf of our users,” Google Chief Executive Eric Schmidt said in a statement.

Twitter and Google have a prospective deal that could affect SEO

admin    Google     Affect, Could, deal, Google, prospective, Twitter

There is currently a prospective deal between Google and Twitter. If the deal pushes through, posts from the social networking site would be displayed on search queries. This has many implications for search engine optimization (SEO) marketers.

According to reports, the two companies are now negotiating to create a feed that would show posts from the social networking giant.

Reportedly, Microsoft is also involved in a deal that would integrate a full feed from micro blogs to the search engines.

Chris Thomas—a SEO expert—says that the deal will change the approach of SEO marketers, because Google would have access to a huge amount of web pages, which will bring more competition in the search market.

Thomas also said that a deal between Google and Twitter is logical, because Google has been responding to Twitter’s real-time search capabilities already.

He explains: “Google has responded to the real-time search thing by speeding up its indexing capabilities, but it’s just not quick enough to keep up with the likes of Twitter which has millions of tweets. Google robots can’t index everything and they need something like this to help.”

He continues: “My gut feeling is that to have this sort of deal there would need to be some sort of staticness or relevance to the tweet feed, because otherwise you’d just be getting spammed by millions of random tweets. If you were doing some sort of SEO strategy you’d need a tweet to your site if someone searched for you, that sort of thing.”

The prospective deal could cost Twitter several million dollars.

So far, executives from all the companies have not made any formal comments and statements regarding the prospective deal.

There is currently a prospective deal between Google and Twitter. If the deal pushes through, posts from the social networking site would be displayed on search queries. This has many implications for search engine optimization (SEO) marketers.

According to reports, the two companies are now negotiating to create a feed that would show posts from the social networking giant.

Reportedly, Microsoft is also involved in a deal that would integrate a full feed from micro blogs to the search engines.

Chris Thomas—a SEO expert—says that the deal will change the approach of SEO marketers, because Google would have access to a huge amount of web pages, which will bring more competition in the search market.

Thomas also said that a deal between Google and Twitter is logical, because Google has been responding to Twitter’s real-time search capabilities already.

He explains: “Google has responded to the real-time search thing by speeding up its indexing capabilities, but it’s just not quick enough to keep up with the likes of Twitter which has millions of tweets. Google robots can’t index everything and they need something like this to help.”

He continues: “My gut feeling is that to have this sort of deal there would need to be some sort of staticness or relevance to the tweet feed, because otherwise you’d just be getting spammed by millions of random tweets. If you were doing some sort of SEO strategy you’d need a tweet to your site if someone searched for you, that sort of thing.”

The prospective deal could cost Twitter several million dollars.

So far, executives from all the companies have not made any formal comments and statements regarding the prospective deal.

There is currently a prospective deal between Google and Twitter. If the deal pushes through, posts from the social networking site would be displayed on search queries. This has many implications for search engine optimization (SEO) marketers.

According to reports, the two companies are now negotiating to create a feed that would show posts from the social networking giant.

Reportedly, Microsoft is also involved in a deal that would integrate a full feed from micro blogs to the search engines.

Chris Thomas—a SEO expert—says that the deal will change the approach of SEO marketers, because Google would have access to a huge amount of web pages, which will bring more competition in the search market.

Thomas also said that a deal between Google and Twitter is logical, because Google has been responding to Twitter’s real-time search capabilities already.

He explains: “Google has responded to the real-time search thing by speeding up its indexing capabilities, but it’s just not quick enough to keep up with the likes of Twitter which has millions of tweets. Google robots can’t index everything and they need something like this to help.”

He continues: “My gut feeling is that to have this sort of deal there would need to be some sort of staticness or relevance to the tweet feed, because otherwise you’d just be getting spammed by millions of random tweets. If you were doing some sort of SEO strategy you’d need a tweet to your site if someone searched for you, that sort of thing.”

The prospective deal could cost Twitter several million dollars.

So far, executives from all the companies have not made any formal comments and statements regarding the prospective deal.