The Nexus Between Being Overweight And Insulin Resistance And How To Prevent It

admin    Google's Nexus One     Being, between, Insulin, Nexus, Overweight, Prevent, Resistance

Being overweight or obese may pose health-related risks. Overweight and obesity have been considered as the leading cause of stroke and hypertension, cancer, and type 2 diabetes milletus. Insulin resistance can result in diabetes. Obesity and insulin resistance are two of the most leading causes of morbidity in developed and developing countries. The number of people that are obese is growing as well as the number of people suffering from insulin resistance.

But what is obesity and what is insulin resistance. How do obesity and insulin resistance affect our health and how should they be prevented?

Obesity occurs when the body mass index (BMI) goes way beyond the normal. A BMI that is beyond 25 is considered overweight while 30 is already at the obese level. Obese people have a tendency to develop insulin resistance, which may then turn to become diabetes if prolonged. The pancreas produces hormone called insulin. The body uses insulin in utilizing blood glucose. Insulin resistance happens when the body no longer absorbs the insulin that the pancreas produces. If this happens the person will soon acquire type 2 diabetes that could be debilitating.

More people are now suffering from these two diseases. They should now be extra careful because it could result to health complications. Obesity and insulin resistance should be managed if not avoided. Sedentary lifestyle and too much intake of food rich in carbohydrates can cause obesity that might well lead to insulin resistance. So, at any rate it must be avoided.

Physical activity is the key to alleviating their possible harmful effects. Regular exercise is the safest and the cheapest remedy. If obesity is addressed, chances are insulin resistance is minimized, so it is like hitting two birds with one stone. This regimen is always a win-win strategy to achieving that good health again. Jogging around or any physical exercise and eating the right kind of food that are less in fat, sugar and salt will surely pay off in the long run. A great deal of self-discipline among people suffering from these diseases is vital. No amount of remedy can ever help anyone if disease management is not strictly followed.

The financial burden of these two diseases could be depressing. If not addressed immediately they could eat someone’s saving to the core. The cost of medication is very expensive. It could be psychologically and physically draining as well.

A good life can be enjoyed to the full if we are disease free. Prevention is still the key to that good life. So be always informed and keep yourself healthy. Stay away from obesity and insulin resistance health problems.

Obesity is a serious problem, whatever age you are, and whatever stage you are in your life. For this reason it is important that obesity is not ignored but addressed as soon as possible so that people can enjoy their life for the full with as few physical ailments as possible.

The Nexus Between Affiliate Networks and Commercial Websites

admin    Google's Nexus One     Affiliate, between, Commercial, Networks, Nexus, Websites

Marketing on the Internet has become the call of the day. As more and more web site owners are signing up for the affiliate programs, the advertisers and the owners of the brands are finding it very enticing to join the bandwagon. Equally interested and happy about this change are the affiliate marketing agencies and the networks. These facilitators have made quite a name in the last couple of years.

Affiliate marketing serves as a great online platforms for promoting and advertising. The marketing method is easy to follow as the procedures and the process is all too simple. Meanwhile, the profits or returns in affiliate marketing are good enough to start a chain reaction. One affiliate, who gets his hands on affiliate marketing tries to convince others, as there are more benefits, very much like the popular Amway marketing practice.

Much of the popularity that affiliate marketing enjoys today is because of the efforts of affiliate networks. Affiliate networks have helped in facilitating business networking between affiliates and the merchants. They are just the convergence points where both affiliates and merchants meet.

Affiliate networks provide hundreds and thousands of programs for different kind of commercial web sites and online portals; everything at just one place. Affiliate networks maintain the clients directory that exhibits both advertisers and the web site owners. This saves the time of both the advertisers and affiliates as they can find all resources and business contacts at one place.

The programs provided by affiliate networks are in fact the programs of the advertisers with mild alterations to compensate for their own services as well as for customizing the services to different site owners. Affiliate marketing networks pitch the programs of the advertisers and persuade the site owners for active participation in the affiliate marketing process. They are the exchange medium between affiliates and merchants and it is through them that much of the interaction between the two parties take place.

Affiliate network have done a great job in making affiliate marketing a popular and widely accepted concept. They are the true pioneers of affiliate marketing.

The Nexus Between Our Failed Drug Strategies and the Breach of Our Southwest Border

admin    Google's Nexus One     between, Border, Breach, Drug, Failed, Nexus, Southwest, Strategies

A POSITION PAPER

Why is it that every time this country faces a very real threat, our elected officials seem to consistently demonstrate that proverbial “deer in the headlight look?” Dates like May 7, 1915, December 7, 1941, February 26, 1993, April 19, 1995, and of course September 11, 2001, are all days that will live in this country’s collective memory, yet these events, and many others less-publicized, appear to have caught our elected leaders, at least publicly, without a clue. Notwithstanding continuous warnings from various federal law enforcement agencies and, dare I be accused of employing an oxymoron, the U.S. intelligence community, our elected leadership has demonstrated an unwavering propensity of being reactive in lieu of proactive in their efforts to protect our citizenry. Indeed, with foreign drug traffickers currently threatening the sovereignty of our southern border, our leadership once again appears bewildered by this most recent turn of events. However, in point-of-fact, this situation has been percolating for some time and is yet just another example of the very same government faux pas that was criticized repeatedly after the events of September 11, 2001 – just because our leaders failed to address an imminent threat doesn’t necessarily mean it wasn’t, in fact, an imminent threat.

Omitting the usual meaningless numerical statistics, and the perpetually self-serving political rhetoric, how did we get to where we are today along our southwest border? Arguably, it is more than coincidental that this country finds itself embroiled in a “border war” with drug traffickers who are posing a very real threat to the safety and well being of innocent citizens on both sides of the border – in fact, it was inevitable. Much like the storied defenders of the revered Alamo, which was occupied by men and women who knowingly put themselves in harms way to defend a national principle, federal narcotics agents with the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), U.S. Border Patrol (USBP), and a host of other law enforcement agencies are no doubt experiencing some of that same apprehension while they too continue their on-going battle along the metaphorical parapets of our southwest border. Even traditional law enforcement critics will agree that federal and state law enforcement personnel have always bravely defended our proverbial walls from southern invaders and have, in fact, consistently “filled the breach” when asked to do so all over the world. However, it begs to question why these few dedicated professionals are not now hunkered down waiting for reinforcements to come riding over the horizon. Simply, like those brave souls at the Alamo, it’s not their style.

By way of background, and contrary to popular opinion, opium had been introduced to this country well before the influx of Chinese laborers arrived to help build the transcontinental railroad, but the use of the drug was somewhat limited in its use and availability. In the early 1970’s injectable heroin, opium’s “bastard child,” began to proliferate the United States due in no small measure to our involvement in Vietnam and major European suppliers with catchy names like the French Connection. At the same time, New York based heroin entrepreneurs like Frank Lucas, Nicky Barnes, and others wrestled the heretofore “controlled” heroin market away from Italian traditional organized crime figures and began flooding the inner-city communities with high-grade/low cost heroin thus, precipitating the American public’s introduction to the now very visible heroin problem as well as its myriad collateral issues, such as higher crime rates and the violence that accompanied it. Interestingly, Russia experienced a near identical social consequence as a result of their failed military involvement (1979-1989) in Afghanistan. 

In July 1973, in an effort to combat our post-war “epidemic,” then President Richard Nixon signed an Executive Order establishing the DEA to combat the flourishing drug trade. Although being greatly outnumbered (about 1200 agents worldwide) and grossly under funded (about $75 million), newly ordained DEA agents, like loyal soldiers, charged the aforementioned breach-in-the-wall and immediately gained some impressive victories while stemming the flow of heroin into this country. However, with all of their limited manpower and funding concentrated on Asian and European heroin, other savvy international entrepreneurs, such as Bolivia based Roberto Suarez and Bismark Barrientos, were preparing to breach our unattended southern borders with another illicit, albeit more socially acceptable, “party drug” called cocaine. As expected, DEA’s extremely limited resources were then shifted to South America to combat this newest threat. DEA’s mantra soon became and remains, “Do More with Less.”

In 1988, an all-volunteer cadre of DEA agents was specially trained by the U.S. military and they began counter-drug operations (Operation Snowcap) in “source countries” such as Bolivia, Peru, and Colombia. In 1991, DEA counter-drug operations opened in Central America (Operation Cadence) to stem the flow of drugs into Mexico by aircraft and tractor-trailers traveling the Pan-American Highway. By overall budgetary “bang-for-the-buck” comparison, these paramilitary operations required relatively few resources, yet had extremely impressive results. DEA agents operating in the jungles of South America seized and/or destroyed hundreds of clandestine cocaine labs and destroyed thousands of gallons of precursor chemicals. Indeed, from the period of 1988 to 1995, thousands of kilograms of cocaine were seized, as were numerous hard-to-replace multi-million dollar retrofitted smuggling aircraft like Beechcraft King/Queen Airs, DC-10, and the coveted long-range/heavy payload Aero-Commander. Impressive seizures to be sure and far surpassing all of the combined cocaine seizures being made by our domestic law enforcement agencies, yet these impressive results were being accomplished by a mere handful of dedicated Temporary Duty (TDY) DEA agents on an extremely limited budget. Notwithstanding the marked successes of these counter-drug operations, there was an eventual political “determination for termination” of these DEA operations causing the United States to lose one of their most effective counter-drug weapons in Central and South America. Unfortunately, with the ill-advised termination of the program, we also lost something much more precious – the unique cooperation and camaraderie that was built between our TDY agents and the various host country law enforcement personnel that worked side-by-side with them. That unique worldwide law enforcement bond, cops working with cops, which transcends politics and even nationality. Lastly, in losing this special relationship, we also lost a precious intelligence resource that several U.S. government entities benefited from and more importantly, something that six (6) dedicated DEA agents tragically gave their lives nurturing – a special relationship that unfortunately, may be too far-gone to be rekindled at this late date.

In any event, with the opening of our southern borders to NAFTA in January 1994, and the politically motivated shift of law enforcement resources away from Central and South America in the mid to late 1990s, we again experienced our government’s inability (or refusal) to learn from their continuing and mostly ineffectual “finger-in-the-dyke” drug enforcement strategy missteps. With all of our political and military attention (and budget) mesmerized with the Middle East and Afghanistan for more than eight years, our national enforcement attention was (again) shifted away from Central and South America for so long that heroin began an inevitable reemergence, as did Methamphetamine, Ecstasy, Ice, and any number of other designer drugs. Furthermore, as if adding insult to injury, we now not only have to address the Mexican/Latin American drug cartels, that have flourished relatively unchecked over the last 8-years, but we now have to contend with multiple left-wing (anti-American) political “dictators” blackmailing us with oil exports, threatening our U.S. Embassy personnel with persona non grata deportation, and even watching some Latin American political “puppets” chewing coca leaves at International political gatherings. Today, frustrated career drug enforcement professionals, who have the most experience in these matters, have collectively come to terms with the fact that “It’s déjà vu all over again.”

Even though the DEA is the only federal agency with a singular enforcement focus and international mission, Congress, in their infinite wisdom, seems intent on annually depleting DEA’s budget while, at the same time, spreading extremely limited counter-drug resources throughout the various federal law enforcement communities. Absent the same political muscle and the always-effective public relations machine of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, DEA leadership appears ineffective in preventing the routine “rape” of their budget and resources. Even stranger should one consider their traditionally limited resources, DEA’s counter-drug and seizure successes are staggering and, more importantly, irrefutable. Nonetheless, our elected leaders have inexplicably insisted on spreading limited counter-drug funding and precious resources throughout all of the other federal agencies (no shortage of acronyms here) where they are relatively free to continue practicing their “Jack of all trades, master of none” philosophy while spending time, manpower, and considerable financial resources on myriad investigative projects to include the occasional “drug case” when the mood strikes them. Truth be told, when drug investigations are simply a “collateral duty,” one can easily suggest (and many do) that a majority of the recent non-DEA federal drug cases were simply selected for the ever-important arrest/seizure statistic and, more importantly, the Andy Warhol 15-minutes they usually generate. 

Notwithstanding the fact that the last four (4) sitting presidents have consistently ordered inter-agency cooperation, the appointment of a “Drug Czar,” as well as several other politically ineffectual attempts to get all U.S. law enforcement on the same sheet of music, we continue to have multiple U.S. agencies investigating “narcotics cases.” Arguably, these uncoordinated efforts are, for the most part, netting nothing more than low-level violators and filling our already over-crowded/over-funded federal prison system (over $5-billion per year) with young people that are having no real effect on the drug problem in this country. More importantly, these continuing ineffective “drug war” strategies, or lack thereof, are providing daily media ammunition to the ever-growing number of “Legalize Drugs” supporters in this country. Indeed, how do we justify, or even explain, hundreds of millions of taxpayer’s dollars being expended by multiple law enforcement agencies in an uncoordinated, ineffective, and unpopular “war” that will never be won in such a disjointed effort. I don’t think even the most experienced Washington, D.C. “spin doctor” could conjure up a rational answer for this one. Imagine, the U.S. Army, the U.S. Marines (and their various Reserve Units), the U.S. Air Force, the National Guard, and the Coast Guard all operating independently in Iraq with their own chain-of-command. Obviously, the result would be ineffectual chaos. Maybe it’s time to heed Albert Einstein who suggested that it was “insane” to do the same thing over and over again and expect a different result.  

In World War II, strategists concurred that the United States could not effectively fight a war on two fronts. Consequently, the decision was made to put all our efforts and resources into defeating the Axis powers in Europe and then turning our attention to Japan. General Dwight D. Eisenhower was appointed as a Supreme Commander of that successful effort. After the tragedy of September 11, 2001, President Bush and his closest advisors agreed that to effectively protect our borders, we needed to consolidate several federal agencies and put them under the Secretary of Homeland Security, consolidating funding, manpower, and more importantly, leadership under one unified command structure. In any armed conflict that this country has ever been involved in, we never developed a strategy that suggested we line our borders with sandbags. We’ve have always taken the fight to our enemies. Applying this same logic, can our leaders develop a workable counter-drug strategy today? The Reader’s Digest version – Yes and fortuitously, there is no real need to re-invent the wheel in order to implement any number of workable scenarios.

One possible scenario, by Executive Order, we could take the manpower allocated to all the federal agencies for “narcotics enforcement” and place them under the singular and unified authority of the DEA – with them would come those agency’s already earmarked “narcotics budget.” With those additional resources, DEA senior management could be directed to increase their foreign operations by 50% over the next 3-years. DEA foreign operations consisting primarily of foreign liaison building, counter-drug operations/verification, intelligence gathering, and active border enforcement – on both sides. At the same time, U.S. Customs/U.S. Border Patrol could be restricted to border cases, smuggling, and violations of our national borders – a no-brainer since there is obviously plenty there to keep them busy. Notwithstanding the ridiculous, albeit inevitable, objections of the rabid NRA supporters, the ATF could be directed to begin a concentrated enforcement effort on the specific weapons-of-choice preferred by drug traffickers, such as the AK-47, Mac 9/10, Ruger Mini-14, AR-15, TEC-9, and high capacity semi-automatic handguns. Lastly, the Federal Bureau of Investigation could be prohibited from working unilateral “drug cases” or expending their resources on any other “stat-generating” investigations best left to state and local authorities. In fact, we might even suggest that they concentrate on what they are supposed to be doing – which should center on critical and ever-increasing Title 18 violations, real-time intelligence gathering, and protecting this country from foreign and/or religious fanatics obsessed with this country’s destruction. Lastly, and more importantly, all heretofore “turf-protected” computer systems (NADDIS, TECS, OCIS, ISIS, Langley, etc.) should be combined and effectively analyzed (in a timely fashion) at a National Intelligence Resource Center staffed by independent, multi-lingual, highly trained, yet non-law enforcement affiliated intelligence analysts. 

Although this is just one of several possible scenarios, most agree that a common thread exists in any successful scenario – our elected leaders need to remove their blinders while, at the same time, ensuring that all of our federal agencies work together for the common good. Now wouldn’t that be a novel idea?

The Nexus between Diet and Behaviour

admin    Google's Nexus One     Behaviour, between, Diet, Nexus

Researchers have found a link between your diet and your behaviour. Certain foods affect the level of neurotransmitter substances in your brain and this in turn affects your mood, behaviour and mental performance. Science has established the saying “You are what you eat” to be true on the basis of how different foods affect brain functions and consequently behaviour and health status.

In my medical practice, I have experienced diminished mental performance after particular meals in the morning; this phenomenon has been described as “brain fog”. Brain fog arises from the diversion of blood circulation from the brain to the intestines. A General Medical Practitioner in Nigeria on a busy day could see a bewildering array of different medical conditions that beg for diagnosis, investigations and treatment; brain fog could become a distraction a busy doctor can ill afford. I have since learned to stay away from foods that cause brain fog in the morning.

Researchers have classified certain foods as “brain food” because they improve cognitive function when eaten. Cognitive function by definition is the process of thinking and knowing that is mediated by the brain. How your brain functions determines how much of a success you would make of the chances that come your way in life. Whatever you eat that promotes cognitive vitality does this by affecting the levels of different neurotransmitter substances [also known as chemical messengers] in the brain. Brain foods increase cognitive vitality by increasing the reserve brain capacity as well as protecting the brain from oxidative damage caused by free radicals.

Three of the most important of these neurotransmitters are dopamine, serotonin and acetylcholine. Neurotransmitters mediate intercellular communication among brain neurons; their lack is associated with different health conditions of the brain and mind. They work by either stimulating [excitatory function] or inhibiting transmission at the nerve endings and these reflect on the mood and actions of the person.

Dopamine stimulates brain function resulting in locomotion, emotional arousal, good attention span and learning; it also inhibits some aspects of brain function. Excess of dopamine in the brain has been linked with Schizophrenia while its deficiency is the underlying cause of Parkinson’s disease. Parkinson’s disease is characterized by tremors, poverty or limitation of movement and unstable gait. All proteinous foods such as eggs, fish and meat are rich in dopamine.

Acetylcholine has been described as the dominant player in the formation of memory in the amygdala, which is a part of the brain. It is involved in behaviour regulation and voluntary muscle movement. Deficiency of acetylcholine is the underlying cause of Alzheimer’s disease; a debilitating and socially isolating condition that presents with progressive memory loss. Food substances that help the body synthesize ample amounts of acetylcholine are peanuts, wheat gem, egg yolks, fish, liver, meat, and vegetables such as broccoli, cabbage and cauliflower.

Serotonin is another neurotransmitter which is abundantly present in starchy foods, vegetables and cereals. When it subserves an inhibitory function in the brain, it controls arousal, sleep, mood and appetite. When serotonin stimulates the brain, it produces feelings of pleasure. Deficiency of serotonin is one of the underlying causes of depression.

Diets loaded with macro and micronutrients such as minerals and Vitamins A, B, C, D and E help the body function properly. Vitamin D helps the bones of the body while Vitamins A C and E are power antioxidants that function to protect cells from oxidative damage resulting from free radicals. Vitamin B is a key component of the enzymatic system in the body and it plays a pivotal role in cellular processes that provide energy to the body.

An adult requires between 1.5 and 2 liters  of water to stay hydrated in 24 hours. Water serves to carry nutrients round the body, is a medium of exchange of electrolytes in the body and it carries wastes to the kidneys for excretion. You must take adequate amount of water daily to stay hydrated. In hot weather, you loose more water and the mechanism of thirst makes you drink more water to correct the deficit. In cold weather, you lose less and consequently drink less water.

Omega-3 oils are good fats that are present in deep sea oily fish, sardines and tuna; when deficient in the body, it can lead to poor mental performance. Adequate intake of these oils is helpful to the brain, heart and joints.

In conclusion, your choice of diet should be determined by the work at hand, the time of the day, and your health status. Take proteinous foods in the mornings to stimulate your brain to function optimally and keep you alert in a working mode. Reserve carbohydrate diet for evenings when it will make you calm, relaxed and ready for sleep. As you age, take liberal amounts of supplements to make up for inadequate dietary intake of these substances.